WW/OCEANFREIG

Filed 657W3M read

P&I Club flags bunker-tank pipe risk after three pollution spills

West of England P&I Club links three tanker pollution spills to defective overboard pipework routed inside fuel oil tanks, warning that closed isolation valves do not stop discharge.

By
James Calloway
Filed
Length
657 words
Read
3 min

Key points05

  • Three pollution incidents linked to overboard pipes routed through oil-containing tanks, all involving tankers
  • Two recent cases involved ODME overboard discharge pipes running through bunker fuel tanks to the hull
  • Closed overboard valves and removed spool pieces did not prevent discharge in either recent case
  • Causes of the two recent failures differed: corrosion and wastage on one vessel, welded-seam cracking on the other
  • West of England has urged members to review fleet overboard piping arrangements and consider class-approved retrofit or newbuild routing changes

The West of England P&I Club has linked three pollution incidents to a single failure mode: defective overboard pipework routed inside fuel oil tanks on tankers. In each case, closing the overboard valve did not stop the discharge.

The club disclosed the pattern in a loss-prevention bulletin to members. Two of the incidents involved Oil Discharge Monitoring Equipment (ODME) overboard discharge pipes running through bunker fuel tanks before reaching the hull. When the pipe section inside the bunker tank failed, fuel entered the pipe and discharged directly overboard, downstream of the closed isolation valve and the removed spool piece.

What failed and why?

The apparent causes diverged between the two recent cases. Investigators identified corrosion and wastage on one vessel. On the other, a crack opened along a welded seam from the vessel's original construction. In both, the pipe wall lost integrity inside the bunker tank, converting the line into an uncontrolled pollution pathway.

The earlier incident involved a deck scupper drain pipe routed through a fuel oil tank. During bunkering, fuel entered the damaged pipe and escaped overboard once the fuel level reached the crack.

Why does a closed valve not protect the ship?

Pipe routed through an oil-containing tank can sit in water internally while facing heated fuel externally. Corrosion, vibration, thermal cycling and stress concentrations act on the wall over time. Sections inside tanks are hard to access during routine surveys, and the industry has no practice of pressure testing them, so defects can remain hidden until failure.

The bulletin warned that any arrangement creating a direct interface between an oil tank and an overboard pipe should not be assumed safe simply because the associated system has been isolated.

What is the commercial exposure?

A bunker spill of this kind exposes the operator to hull and machinery claims, P&I cover, charter party disputes and port-state enforcement. Civil penalties apply in most jurisdictions, and emergency-response tugs, boom deployment and shoreline clean-up costs typically fall on the owner. Charter terms determine how the burden splits with charterers, but downtime and reputational damage hit the operator regardless.

The advisory also has newbuilding implications. Classification societies may face renewed questions on pipe routing standards for tankers and any vessel type carrying oil-containing tanks.

What does the club recommend?

The West of England "strongly recommends" that members and ship managers review overboard piping arrangements across their fleets, focusing on any pipe passing through a bunker or cargo oil tank that could create a direct route to the sea after loss of pipe integrity. Specific actions include:

  • Identifying vulnerable arrangements using piping diagrams, tank plans and construction drawings
  • Inspecting the full pipe length inside tanks, including welded seams, joints, supports and areas prone to vibration or stress
  • Confirming whether isolation measures cover the entire pipe, including any section downstream of the isolation point
  • Reviewing planned maintenance systems to address concealed pipework
  • Routing new overboard piping through void spaces rather than oil tanks where practical
  • Reporting any cracking, defective welds, corrosion or wastage to the classification society
  • Limiting maximum tank filling levels as an interim risk control where vulnerable arrangements stay in service
  • Preparing ship-specific contingency plans for leakage from a concealed overboard pipe

For existing vessels, the club suggests consulting the classification society on possible retrofit modifications. Newbuildings should address the routing question at the design stage.

How should owners respond to a suspected leak?

The bulletin directs crews to activate shipboard pollution response procedures, notify relevant parties and reduce pressure on the damaged pipe without delay. Stopping the discharge outweighs operational concerns linked to fuel transfer and compatibility. Any temporary plugging counts as an emergency control measure only; permanent repairs must follow safe tank preparation and classification society approval.

With classification societies likely to field questions on pipe routing, operators of tankers and other oil-carrying tonnage should expect closer scrutiny of concealed overboard pipework during upcoming special surveys.

Source: Hellenic Shipping News

Share this article:

More from James Calloway

James Calloway

Show full bio

Correspondent covering consumer brands and retail at Waybill Wire.

229 articles

Related05

  1. IMO Forum Flags Spill-Response Gaps as Alternative Bunkers Scale Up

  2. Tanker Ablaze in Strait of Hormuz as Attack Count Outpaces Reporting

  3. Mideast Oil Flows Hit 98% of Pre-War Levels, JPMorgan and Goldman Say

  4. Three More Tanker Attacks Surface in Delayed Hormuz Reports

  5. Second KOTC VLCC struck in Hormuz as Yanbu hit again

« Prev