WW/PORTSTERMI

Filed 671W3M read

Maersk's Two-Track Port Play: Euroports Bulk, Vietnam Rail

APM Capital takes 53.35% of Euroports' 70m-tonne bulk network while APM Terminals signs a $3.5bn Vietnam rail MOU — two arms of one corridor-control strategy.

By
Amara Osei
Filed
Length
671 words
Read
3 min
How Maersk is building port power
How Maersk is building port powersmartschwarz / pixabay

Key points05

  • APM Capital agreed on 28 September to buy 53.35% of Euroports, operator of 50+ terminals handling over 70 million tonnes a year.
  • APM Terminals signed an MOU with Hateco on 20 October for a Vietnam rail terminal network worth up to US$3.5 billion.
  • APM took over Balboa, Panama in February after the Supreme Court annulled CK Hutchison's concessions.
  • Euroports deal closure is pending regulatory approvals expected in Q1 2027.
  • Panama Ports Company has launched London arbitration against Maersk over Balboa.

Two deals carrying the Maersk family name, signed within three weeks of each other, have redrawn the map of the group's port ambitions — and both point at the same destination: control of corridors, not just quays.

On 28 September, APM Capital agreed to acquire a 53.35% stake in the parent of Euroports, an operator of more than 50 deep-sea and inland terminals across ten European countries and China. Euroports handles over 70 million tonnes of bulk, breakbulk and liquid bulk a year — fertilizers, grain, sugar, metals and forest products, the cargo that keeps European industry and food systems running.

Three weeks later, on 20 October in Copenhagen, APM Terminals signed a memorandum of understanding with Vietnamese conglomerate Hateco for a rail freight terminal network in northern Vietnam valued at up to US$3.5 billion. Put in perspective: Hateco valued its earlier Haiphong port project with Maersk at US$400 million, roughly a ninth of the new rail ceiling. Headline figures, in short, are running well ahead of committed money.

Two arms, one strategy

APM Terminals, Maersk's port unit, runs container terminals, and its investments follow the corridors that geopolitics is redrawing. Vietnam shows the template in four steps:

  • APM began as an adviser to Hateco in 2023.
  • It took a 49% stake in the Haiphong international container terminal in April 2026.
  • It joined the Lien Chieu port project in Danang.
  • It is now moving to the railhead.

Each step pushes control further from the quay into the hinterland. The same logic runs through on-dock rail at Mobile in the US, the rail-heavy Rijka Gateway in Croatia, and Balboa in Panama, where APM took over operations in February after Panama's Supreme Court annulled CK Hutchison's concessions and the Panama Maritime Authority took possession of the port by decree.

APM Capital is a different instrument. It is a separate infrastructure fund manager backed by A.P. Moller Holding, and it invests where the container business does not reach — bulk and breakbulk rather than boxes. Coming after APMC's investment in Spain's BERGÉ Logistics, the Euroports deal gives the group a layered presence in Iberia: APM Terminals' container gateways at Valencia and Barcelona, ringed by bulk, breakbulk and logistics assets around them. APMC chief executive Kim Fejfer framed the purchase in the language of resilient supply chains and secure trade flows.

Belgium's public investors SFPIM and PMV remain Euroports shareholders, with SFPIM saying it intends to keep strategic assets anchored in Belgium.

What does the government endorsement change?

Plenty. The Hateco agreement was signed during the state visit of Vietnam's General Secretary and President Tô Lâm to Denmark. Balboa changed hands by decree after court intervention. In each case, the Maersk position is co-owned or endorsed by the host government. That is the reverse of the exposure that cost CK Hutchison its Panama ports.

The contrast with CMA CGM is equally sharp. Where the French carrier orchestrates its network with as few hard assets as possible, the APM Group layers them — across cargo types and transport modes, on corridors aligned with the West.

Where the model could crack

The risks aren't hypothetical. Panama Ports Company has brought arbitration in London against Maersk over Balboa, and proceedings are likely to take years. Euroports still needs regulatory approvals, expected in the first quarter of 2027. And its footprint includes terminals in China — meaning a group building alternatives to Chinese port networks will itself hold assets under Chinese jurisdiction.

Vietnam adds its own exposure: the country's double-digit growth target is exposed to fuel disruption from the Iran war. Operating risk sits with APM Terminals, balance-sheet flexibility with A.P. Moller Capital, and political legitimacy is borrowed from host states.

Three markers will show whether the model holds: Panama's long-term tender for Balboa, regulatory clearance for Euroports, and the first binding commitment under the Vietnam memorandum. Watch those, and the strategy's substance — or its limits — will announce itself.

Source: Container News

Share this article:

More from Amara Osei

Amara Osei

Show full bio

Staff writer covering regulation, policy and their impact on Ocean and air freight, container shipping at Waybill Wire.

639 articles

Related05

  1. Maersk and Hateco Plan $3.5 Billion Rail Freight Terminal Network in Vietnam

  2. Hateco and APM Terminals target Vietnam rail freight with new MOU

  3. A.P. Møller Capital takes 53.35% control of Euroports

  4. A.P. Moller Capital to Take Majority Stake in 50-Terminal Euroports

  5. APM Terminals Suape handles first vessel, lifts complex capacity 55%

« PrevNext »