WW/OCEANFREIG

Filed 680W3M read

Tankers keep burning in Hormuz despite de-escalation hopes

Thirty-seven ships were attacked in October, the war's highest monthly toll, as tanker fires, mine strikes, oil spills and a U.S. blockade kept Strait of Hormuz risks elevated.

By
James Calloway
Filed
Length
680 words
Read
3 min
Tankers Continue to Burn in the Middle East Despite Hopes for De-escalation
Tankers Continue to Burn in the Middle East Despite Hopes for De-escalationCanadian-Nature-Visions / pixabay

Key points05

  • 37 ships were attacked in October, the highest monthly total since the war began.
  • The IMO has confirmed 130 regional maritime incidents since late February, with at least 25 seafarers killed.
  • Three tankers were hit on Sunday, including a Navig8 vessel that caught fire near Oman.
  • A U.S. military aircraft disabled a St Kitts-flagged cargo vessel after it visited an Iranian port.
  • Crude prices hit two-month lows on Tuesday as U.S. officials downplayed further military action.

By James Calloway

October attacks affected 37 ships, the highest monthly tally since the Iran war began, and there was little sign of attacks abating in November, according to Washington Institute for Near East Policy data.

The International Maritime Organization has confirmed 130 incidents since the conflict started in late February, most of them attacks, with at least 25 seafarers killed.

Market bets favored de-escalation, but the physical toll continued to run against a calmer oil-market signal. On Tuesday, crude prices hit two-month lows after U.S. officials downplayed the need for additional military action against Iran. Analysts linked the move partly to President Donald Trump’s more conciliatory tone since the Republicans’ defeat in the November 3 midterm elections.

What happened in Hormuz?

Social-media video posted Sunday and verified by Reuters showed a Navig8 tanker on fire near Oman’s coast. An image captured Sunday by the European Union’s Copernicus Sentinel-2 satellite showed a large cloud of black smoke at the same location.

Iranian state broadcaster IRIB, citing the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy, said three tankers came under attack Sunday for using “unauthorized routes” through the Strait of Hormuz. The Navig8 vessel was one of the three.

Navig8 manages the vessel, and ADNOC Logistics & Services majority-owns the manager. Neither company answered emailed requests for comment from Reuters.

Damaged tankers leaked oil. A Monday social-media video verified by Reuters showed oil reaching Oman’s shores, while satellite imagery showed spills off the coast of Oman and the United Arab Emirates. The Omani government did not respond to a Reuters request for comment on Tuesday.

What did the U.S. blockade mean for shipping?

At the same time, U.S. forces continued enforcing a naval blockade of Iranian ports. In the latest action, a U.S. military aircraft fired on and disabled a St Kitts-flagged cargo vessel after it visited an Iranian port on Saturday and tried to depart regional waters, U.S. Central Command said.

Another tanker sustained a strike northeast of Oman’s Lima on Tuesday, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations agency said, without identifying the attacker. In a separate Tuesday statement, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Navy said two tankers caught fire after hitting naval mines on the “unauthorized route” in the strait.

What happened beyond Hormuz?

Iran and its regional allies also struck energy and civilian targets, including offices of Saudi Aramco (2223.SE), the world’s largest oil company. Reuters-verified video showed damage to an Aramco office building in Riyadh after Houthi-claimed missile strikes on November 8.

The Saudi Energy Ministry said an Aramco building in Riyadh had been targeted in an attempted attack. Debris caused limited damage, with no injuries or fatalities.

What does this mean for shippers and carriers?

Crude’s benchmark decline does not erase the operating risk documented around the strait. Shippers face cargo-continuity and scheduling exposure; carriers face voyage interruptions, emergency response and oil-spill pressure; forwarders face a sharper need to verify vessel status, route compliance and whether cargo can clear U.S. blockade restrictions.

No tanker freight rates, vessel capacity or port throughput figures were reported, so the cost effect cannot be quantified. For a shipper, the relevant distinction is between a lower crude benchmark and a tanker that cannot complete its voyage or a cargo exposed to spill damage.

That distinction matters because the Sunday fires, mine claims and U.S. disablement show that market de-escalation and operational safety have moved in opposite directions. A carrier may have cargo available but face route or departure constraints, while a forwarder must track the status of each vessel rather than rely on the oil price alone.

What comes next?

U.S. policy remains mixed: officials have downplayed the need for additional strikes, but U.S. forces continued enforcing the blockade of Iranian ports. The November attack count, further mine or tanker incidents, and the pace of U.S. enforcement will tell shippers whether the de-escalation reflected in Tuesday’s crude prices has reached the water.

Source: gCaptain

Share this article:

More from James Calloway

James Calloway

Show full bio

Correspondent covering companies, deals and strategy in Ocean and air freight, container shipping at Waybill Wire.

816 articles

Related05

  1. Hormuz Tanker Attacks Hit 12 in a Week, Highest Since Iran War Began

  2. 28 Attacks in October: Hormuz Fleet Was Never Built for War

  3. Two More Tankers Struck in Hormuz as U.S. Disable Strike Hits Fourth Ship

  4. Iran warns ships going dark in Hormuz will be treated as hostile

  5. Four Tankers Afire in Strait of Hormuz as IRGC Cites 'Unauthorised Routes'

« PrevNext »